Hi all, putting the cursor on your own name reveals a mystery. Where does 16 right, played 26 (for me) come from? As I have had the last 4or 5 correct, those numbers have not changed. My score goes up and down from 50 - 53%, down from 100%.
As we modellers have an interest in scale, numbers and calculations we are the wrong group to get screwed up data results.
Roy
Hi all, putting the cursor on your own name reveals a mystery. Where does 16 right, played 26 (for me) come from? As I have had the last 4or 5 correct, those numbers have not changed. My score goes up and down from 50 - 53%, down from 100%.
As we modellers have an interest in scale, numbers and calculations we are the wrong group to get screwed up data results.
Roy
I got it correct today WHoopee!!!🤣🤣. But I opened up and my % had dropped again even thought yesterday I got it correct, This is happening almost every day this week. It's kin stupid🙈🤕. I don't mind being bottom of the list as at school I was mostly in the corner with the dunce's hat on, but there you go. I'll just go ⛵sailing on tying to get higher. It's now been months since I had a 100% score since the higher archery changed the scoring system again. It's like being back in the classroom and I'm 6 again, I'l go and get the cane and book, I used to get that at least once a week or the ruler across the knuckles. 🤕🤕.
I got it correct today WHoopee!!!🤣🤣. But I opened up and my % had dropped again even thought yesterday I got it correct, This is happening almost every day this week. It's kin stupid🙈🤕. I don't mind being bottom of the list as at school I was mostly in the corner with the dunce's hat on, but there you go. I'll just go ⛵sailing on tying to get higher. It's now been months since I had a 100% score since the higher archery changed the scoring system again. It's like being back in the classroom and I'm 6 again, I'l go and get the cane and book, I used to get that at least once a week or the ruler across the knuckles. 🤕🤕.
Well that one got me a bit confused. As an Electronics Engineer, I thought I can't get this wrong because I know my stuff. However with the option of the Telegraph being in the answer I had two choices. Bell's patent was for "the method of, and apparatus for, transmitting vocal or other sounds telegraphically" Of course we all call it a Telephone. Anyway I chose the obvious and got it right. 😁
Well that one got me a bit confused. As an Electronics Engineer, I thought I can't get this wrong because I know my stuff. However with the option of the Telegraph being in the answer I had two choices. Bell's patent was for "the method of, and apparatus for, transmitting vocal or other sounds telegraphically" Of course we all call it a Telephone. Anyway I chose the obvious and got it right. 😁
So far my collection resembles "The Island of Misfit Toys". I've picked up several boats that are old builds and have been neglected. I'm giving them the TLC they need, hoping to bring them back to their former glory. Once I get enough practice/ experience I intend to take on a full build.
Amazing England is a island and yet as a country we seem to know very little about history of our navy , I can say this because I included myself .🙄
Philuk👍
Amazing England is a island and yet as a country we seem to know very little about history of our navy , I can say this because I included myself .🙄
Philuk👍
Hi Nick,
Good idea, thanks for the prompt👍
I think on balance I will go with just CLOT! (Not an acronym😉)
Cheers, ciao, tschüss, adieu, adiós, doei, Ваше здоровье, veb, Doug😎
Hi Nick,
Good idea, thanks for the prompt👍
I think on balance I will go with just CLOT! (Not an acronym😉)
Cheers, ciao, tschüss, adieu, adiós, doei, Ваше здоровье, veb, Doug😎
Young at heart 😉 Slightly older in other places.😊 Cheers Doug
Ye Gods and little fishes!
You might just as well ask 'When was 1915?'.🙄
AI: Awesome Idiocy.
Wonder who the 6% are who went for 1920.
Probably the same guys who thought submarines had nuclear power in 1905😂🤣
Hey ho. All good fun what!
Cheers All, Doug😎
Ye Gods and little fishes!
You might just as well ask 'When was 1915?'.🙄
AI: Awesome Idiocy.
Wonder who the 6% are who went for 1920.
Probably the same guys who thought submarines had nuclear power in 1905😂🤣
Hey ho. All good fun what!
Cheers All, Doug😎
Young at heart 😉 Slightly older in other places.😊 Cheers Doug
Oh Dear! That is the most stupid question yet! What happened in 1915 can only be what happened in 1915 and not the distant future. The detail is irrelevant as logically there is only one correct answer!
Score must be ascending now!
Roy
Oh Dear! That is the most stupid question yet! What happened in 1915 can only be what happened in 1915 and not the distant future. The detail is irrelevant as logically there is only one correct answer!
I have the feeling I have been supplying all the right answers but in the wrong order!
I shall be glad to move further south for questions. Once I was 100% and of course the only way is then down and down and down.
Please no more ice and submarine questions for a bit it is getting tedious and also contraversial as to the answers. I checked later on Wiki and the answers given do not stack up with Wiki data. So where do the answers come from? Is Wikipedia wrong?
I am told AI is the future and if so it looks like the future is dodgy based on contraversial data and interpretation.
AI is based on known data and popular belief so does that mean that different data bases from other countries will have correct data? Consider China and America their view of facts and where they are obtained will be different.
Speaking to a well versed IT expert leaves me worried that soon we shalll be faced with disbelieving most News and TV as it will take more time to work out where the truth does lie, than watching the TV. So do not watch any.
I have watched a video of what appeared to be a well known film star in court and 'surprising' the judge on his expertise. When another similar story emerged I realised this was AI inspired and total fiction. The over descriptive rhetoric for scenes and peoples feelings is a good clue.
On our QoD quizz many answers have been challenged to the extent that on one occasion the obviously wrong answer was washed out. What can I believe? And how obscure should questions be?
regards to all
Roy
I have the feeling I have been supplying all the right answers but in the wrong order!
I shall be glad to move further south for questions. Once I was 100% and of course the only way is then down and down and down.
Please no more ice and submarine questions for a bit it is getting tedious and also contraversial as to the answers. I checked later on Wiki and the answers given do not stack up with Wiki data. So where do the answers come from? Is Wikipedia wrong?
I am told AI is the future and if so it looks like the future is dodgy based on contraversial data and interpretation.
AI is based on known data and popular belief so does that mean that different data bases from other countries will have correct data? Consider China and America their view of facts and where they are obtained will be different.
Speaking to a well versed IT expert leaves me worried that soon we shalll be faced with disbelieving most News and TV as it will take more time to work out where the truth does lie, than watching the TV. So do not watch any.
I have watched a video of what appeared to be a well known film star in court and 'surprising' the judge on his expertise. When another similar story emerged I realised this was AI inspired and total fiction. The over descriptive rhetoric for scenes and peoples feelings is a good clue.
On our QoD quizz many answers have been challenged to the extent that on one occasion the obviously wrong answer was washed out. What can I believe? And how obscure should questions be?
Well I got this correct as I have been researching polar sub expeditions. But good old Ai got it wrong again. Skate (SSN-578) was the first to surface at the North Pole on the 17th March 1959. It did surface again in 1962 but that was August 62, when it did the first rendezvous with the Seadragon (SSN-584) Both subs surfaced. A commemorative envelope was produced to celebrate the occasion.
[{"id":"174090266288","name":"174090266288","caption":"","url":"https:\/\/hobby.land\/media\/174090266288\/l","thumbUrl":"https:\/\/hobby.land\/media\/174090266288\/s","isImage":false,"ext":"file"}]
Well I got this correct as I have been researching polar sub expeditions. But good old Ai got it wrong again. Skate (SSN-578) was the first to surface at the North Pole on the 17th March 1959. It did surface again in 1962 but that was August 62, when it did the first rendezvous with the Seadragon (SSN-584) Both subs surfaced. A commemorative envelope was produced to celebrate the occasion.
Thinking about it a little deeper, it is a good job that the Vikings didn’t transit the Northwest Passage using a Sunstone or we might be in a never ending loop of questions.🤔
Thinking about it a little deeper, it is a good job that the Vikings didn’t transit the Northwest Passage using a Sunstone or we might be in a never ending loop of questions.🤔
I cannot promise to finish one project before starting another. I know, I tried.
This is getting silly. It certainly was not the Explorer in 1959, most of that year it was in refit and didn't get back to sea until August 1959. But an Amercian sub called the USS Skate did surface at the North Pole in September 1959. As RNinMunich says it was the Dreadnaught in 1971. There is a book about it called "Breaking Through" which seems to be a free download from here: https://www.rnsubmusfriends.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Breaking-Through.-Final.pdf
This is getting silly. It certainly was not the Explorer in 1959, most of that year it was in refit and didn't get back to sea until August 1959. But an Amercian sub called the USS Skate did surface at the North Pole in September 1959. As RNinMunich says it was the Dreadnaught in 1971. There is a book about it called "Breaking Through" which seems to be a free download from here: https://www.rnsubmusfriends.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Breaking-Through.-Final.pdf
Hmm! OBJECTION!! I demand a re-count. AI has cocked it up again good n proper this time!😠
Dreadnought is correct , but on 3rd March 1971.
Explorer was an experimental boat using hydrogen peroxide in non-air breathing engines.
There is no evidence that she ever went near the Arctic in her short career, whereas Dreadnought's visit, during Arctic Exercise 'SNIFF', is well documented.
The peroxide engines were so unreliable and dangerous to the crew that they were abandoned in favour of nuclear power, as used on Dreadnought.
😎
Hmm! OBJECTION!! I demand a re-count. AI has cocked it up again good n proper this time!😠
Dreadnought is correct , but on 3rd March 1971.
Explorer was an experimental boat using hydrogen peroxide in non-air breathing engines.
There is no evidence that she ever went near the Arctic in her short career, whereas Dreadnought's visit, during Arctic Exercise 'SNIFF', is well documented.
The peroxide engines were so unreliable and dangerous to the crew that they were abandoned in favour of nuclear power, as used on Dreadnought.
😎
Young at heart 😉 Slightly older in other places.😊 Cheers Doug